Timeline · No. 03
Nineteen years
- The line
- Event
- Missed chance
- The catch
- A wait
Notation
- The line
- Time, left to right. Down the screen on a phone.
- Event
- A fact on the record.
- Missed chance
- The system had him and let him go.
- The catch
- The error that ended it, knocked out of line.
- Open case
- No one charged.
- A wait
- Time passes and nothing moves.
Data table
| Year | Event | Notation |
|---|---|---|
| 1983 | suspect | Event |
| 1984 | polygraph passed | Missed chance |
| 1987 | saliva sample taken | Event |
| 2001 | DNA match · arrest | The catch |
| 2003 | guilty plea · 48 counts | Event |
| 1987–2001 | the sample sits 14 years | A wait |
Drawn from: State v. Ridgway, King County, plea statement 2003 · Prothero & Smith, ‘Defending Gary’
The case
Seattle area, from 1982. At least 49 women and girls killed, many of them teenagers working along Pacific Highway South, often not reported missing for weeks. Gary Ridgway was a suspect by 1983. He passed a polygraph in 1984. Police took his saliva in 1987. It sat fourteen years until DNA could read it. Arrested 2001.
The mechanism
Why did it take nineteen years to arrest Gary Ridgway?
What protected him was victim choice. He told the court he picked women he believed would not be reported missing, and for years that was true. Concealment is not intelligence. It is choosing people the system is slow to look for.
The rule
Brains did not keep him free. Indifference did.
Exhibits


The record
Sources
State v. Ridgway, King County Superior Court — plea statement, Nov 5, 2003
Prothero & Smith, ‘Defending Gary’ (Wiley, 2006), p. 150 — Ridgway IQ 85, tested for the defense by Dr. Craig Beaver (his defense lawyer’s account)
Transcript54.1 s
- 0:00
Claim
An IQ of 85 stayed free for nineteen years.
- 0:04
Case
Seattle area, from 1982. At least 49 women and girls killed, many of them teenagers working along Pacific Highway South, often not reported missing for weeks. Gary Ridgway was a suspect by 1983. He passed a polygraph in 1984. Police took his saliva in 1987. It sat fourteen years until DNA could read it. Arrested 2001.
- 0:30
Mechanism
What protected him was victim choice. He told the court he picked women he believed would not be reported missing, and for years that was true. Concealment is not intelligence. It is choosing people the system is slow to look for.
- 0:45
Rule and source
Brains did not keep him free. Indifference did. Source: King County plea statement, 2003.
Educational analysis. Adjudicated cases only. Victims named with respect.
Questions
Who were Gary Ridgway’s victims?
- At least 49 women and girls in the Seattle area, from 1982. Many were teenagers working along Pacific Highway South. They were often not reported missing for weeks.
When did police first suspect Gary Ridgway?
- By 1983. He passed a polygraph in 1984, and police took his saliva in 1987. He was arrested in 2001.
How was Gary Ridgway caught?
- By DNA. The saliva sample police took in 1987 sat for fourteen years until DNA testing could read it. He was arrested in 2001.
What was Gary Ridgway’s IQ?
- 85, tested for the defense by Dr. Craig Beaver, according to his defense lawyer’s account in ‘Defending Gary’.
What did Gary Ridgway plead guilty to?
- Forty-eight counts, in King County Superior Court, on November 5, 2003.